[corosync] why remove lcr from corosync release 2.0.x?

george puttycn at gmail.com
Wed Jun 6 08:11:15 GMT 2012


Hi,

2012/6/6 Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com>

> Please keep your replies on the mailing list.
>
> On 6/6/2012 9:47 AM, george wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > 2012/6/6 Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com
> > <mailto:fdinitto at redhat.com>>
> >
> >     On 6/6/2012 9:08 AM, george wrote:
> >
> >     >
> >     > Also pacemaker v1.6.x and cman v3 will use lcr lib in corosync, so
> >     does
> >     > it mean pcmk v1.6.x and cman v3 can’t use the newest corosync?
> >
> >     corosync 2.0 has votequorum (see man pages) that obsoleted cman in
> the
> >     2.0 serie. You will need pcmk 1.1.7 or higher to work with that.
> >
> > 1、Does that mean LCR lib will be permanently deleted from corosync 2.0 ?
>
> It has been removed permanently already.
>
> >
> > 2、corosync 2.0 could only be worked with pcmk 1.1.7 or higher, and
> > can't work with cman ?
>
> Yes that is correct. cman has been replaced by votequorum. cman will
> only work with corosync 1.4.x (or higher) for several years to come.
>
>  How does pcmk use the votequorum service, I can't find any votequorum
interface
call in pcmk source code.

> Fabio
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Qiu Zhigang
> >
> >     Fabio
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     discuss mailing list
> >     discuss at corosync.org <mailto:discuss at corosync.org>
> >     http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
三尺男儿,两柄须眉,一腔热血。夜里三更眠,梦醒五更天。悬梁刺骨多磨砺,争朝夕,扬眉吐气。豪情溢满杯。
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.corosync.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20120606/45590ede/attachment.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list